|
Post by Alicia Calaway on Jul 3, 2008 10:08:53 GMT -5
Yeah, sure Alicia, why not? How mature of you. And like I said above, I didn't accuse any of you of cheating. Yeah, you didn't actually accuse any of us, but you implied that some of us would give out answers to certain players. Anyway, Raymond never said that the players were not allowed to ask the eliminated castaways for answers. So...sometimes its a case of "Ask, and ye shall receive"
|
|
|
Post by Sundra Oakley on Jul 3, 2008 10:15:38 GMT -5
You're missing my point completely. Exactly!! It doesn't state you can't give or ask for answers, thus it's not against the rules. Although techincally, messaging a juror is against the rules, and vice versa but there are ways to get around that obviously. My point however, that therefore means the jury can influence such an important immunity challenge by giving answers to players they'd rather see win over others. So it puts some people at an unfair advantage, that was my point, and my only point, and I'm not one to keep my points held in.
I'm not criticising the challenge, as it's a great challenge, I'm just stating that I feel it's kinda unfair in that respect, as like I said, it's obvious some people don't follow certain rules anyway, and I'd like to think I'm completley within my rights to express that.
|
|
|
Post by Wizard. Oz on Jul 3, 2008 10:25:00 GMT -5
Or its obvius that some people DIDNT follow some rules in the past (rules that they were not clear about) but they stop doing so and now they DO follow the rules and NEVER EVER EVER thought on giving certain players and advantage, yet some people thought they would.
|
|
|
Post by Rudy on Jul 3, 2008 11:32:18 GMT -5
Ya Alicia, she has been doing that to alot of people it seems.
|
|
|
Post by Rudy on Jul 3, 2008 11:33:21 GMT -5
You guys better quit talking in here tho because she just may try to get all the jurors who post ousted from the game!
|
|
|
Post by τιñα on Jul 3, 2008 12:18:10 GMT -5
Sorry for not sending in the challenge answers.
|
|
|
Post by Sundra Oakley on Jul 3, 2008 12:37:36 GMT -5
You guys better quit talking in here tho because she just may try to get all the jurors who post ousted from the game! Wow. Doesn't "she" have a name now? Oh, don't talk utter garbage Rudy, have I not been talking to the jurors also? No? Would that not be a bit stupid and hypocritical of me? No? Considering how many times you've had 'run ins' with jurors in challenges, Alicia in particular, I don't think you have any room to talk especially as my comments were directed at the host and misinterpreted by Ozzy and Alcia.
|
|
|
Post by Silas on Jul 3, 2008 12:46:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Sundra Oakley on Jul 3, 2008 12:54:45 GMT -5
^^ I'm still in the game Silas, so change mine to ;d please
|
|
|
Post by Rudy on Jul 3, 2008 12:57:36 GMT -5
You guys better quit talking in here tho because she just may try to get all the jurors who post ousted from the game! Wow. Doesn't "she" have a name now? Oh, don't talk utter garbage Rudy, have I not been talking to the jurors also? No? Would that not be a bit stupid and hypocritical of me? No? Considering how many times you've had 'run ins' with jurors in challenges, Alicia in particular, I don't think you have any room to talk especially as my comments were directed at the host and misinterpreted by Ozzy and Alcia. Yes you have a name silly. It's Sundra! But I was talking specifically to those who were "talking" and they can tell it was referring to you, so I guess I got lazy cause she has less letters. lol Her name is Sundra, not "she." Better
|
|
|
Post by [[Elisabeth Hasselbeck]] on Jul 3, 2008 13:57:39 GMT -5
Geez...All-Stars would have been too intense for this kind giver of Immunity.
|
|
|
Post by [[Elisabeth Hasselbeck]] on Jul 3, 2008 14:00:14 GMT -5
BTW, I officially changed my name to the correct last name after years!LMAO!
|
|
|
Post by Stacy on Jul 3, 2008 14:57:43 GMT -5
You're missing my point completely. Exactly!! It doesn't state you can't give or ask for answers, thus it's not against the rules. Although techincally, messaging a juror is against the rules, and vice versa but there are ways to get around that obviously. My point however, that therefore means the jury can influence such an important immunity challenge by giving answers to players they'd rather see win over others. So it puts some people at an unfair advantage, that was my point, and my only point, and I'm not one to keep my points held in. This reminds me of something....
|
|
|
Post by Alicia Calaway on Jul 3, 2008 16:37:49 GMT -5
[ Considering how many times you've had 'run ins' with jurors in challenges, Alicia in particular *Winks at Rudy*
|
|
|
Post by Alicia Calaway on Jul 3, 2008 18:17:19 GMT -5
You guys better quit talking in here tho because she just may try to get all the jurors who post ousted from the game! Sundra can't do that. The rules only said that we jurors couldn't talk in the TC thread (ugh i hate that rule lol), but it didn't say we couldn't talk in the challenge threads.
|
|